Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

darft of reactive Hazelcast session repository #1174

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 2.7.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

OlegDokuka
Copy link

@OlegDokuka OlegDokuka commented Aug 29, 2018

Provided a draft implementation of HazelcastReactiveSessionRepository which gives an asynchronous access to stored in Hazelcast sessions and may benefits resources utilization and apps performance.

This PR is for running the discussion and possibly end up with final implementation that will be merged

@vpavic vpavic added this to the General Backlog milestone Sep 22, 2018
@vpavic vpavic self-assigned this Sep 22, 2018
@vpavic vpavic removed their assignment Sep 26, 2018
@vpavic vpavic modified the milestones: General Backlog, 2.2.x Nov 2, 2018
@vpavic vpavic self-requested a review November 2, 2018 11:24
@vpavic vpavic modified the milestones: 2.2.x, 2.x Sep 24, 2019
@taylancapraz
Copy link

is there any plan for this task?

@rwinch rwinch removed this from the 2.x milestone Nov 15, 2022
@DidierLoiseau
Copy link

Oh man, I hadn’t noticed this PR existed when I created #2222, you didn’t reference #831

Our implementations are very similar, except yours is for Hazelcast 3 and you chose to remove the support of application events.

I guess both could be merged if they want to support both Hazelcast 3 and 4+ in 2.x (Hazelcast 3 support was removed in spring-session 3.x).

@StevenPG
Copy link

Is there further decision making on this? Using Spring Boot 3.1.4 with spring session and spring cloud gateway and this is a blocker, since gateway uses Webflux.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants