Add codespell action in CI + fix typos #91
+16
−3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ArielElp
reviewed
May 16, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Already merged the other PR fixing the description issue which I think creates conflicts. If you rebase I can merge the workflow addition.
Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @ClementWalter)
ClementWalter
force-pushed
the
cw/ci/codespell
branch
from
1cb4fa8
to
b4134cb
Compare
ClementWalter
force-pushed
the
cw/ci/codespell
branch
from
b4134cb
to
5739063
Compare
ArielElp
approved these changes
May 18, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:
|
hey @ArielElp , what should I do next? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As mentioned in #90, the spec entails some typo. So, proposition to add a spell checker in the CI, that would at least have caught the reported typo from #90