Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📝 Refresh six classic guides #723

Draft
wants to merge 46 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JFWooten4
Copy link
Contributor

@JFWooten4 JFWooten4 commented Jun 26, 2024

Solving #338 🤝

@JFWooten4 JFWooten4 marked this pull request as draft June 26, 2024 14:12
@briwylde08
Copy link
Contributor

briwylde08 commented Aug 8, 2024

Hi @JFWooten4! The bounty is over but we'll still accept and award this PR whenever it's ready!! Thanks for all your work on this one!

@JFWooten4 JFWooten4 marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2024 19:24
@JFWooten4 JFWooten4 marked this pull request as draft August 12, 2024 19:31
@JFWooten4
Copy link
Contributor Author

JFWooten4 commented Sep 4, 2024

Understood @briwylde08—appreciate your support. 🫱🏼‍🫲🏻 I'd also like to thank @silence48, @earrietadev, @ducksquaddd, and @conveyGhost for their helpful perspectives around native protocol AMMs. Further shoutout to @orbitlens who was a vocal early advocate of developing the most efficient system.

A lot more to explain here given common perspective, available at https://www.youtube.com/live/3AGhdiQeXE0?t=1800
While I appreciate that the legacy dialogue around atomic swaps has been between chains, I respectfully submit that this is only because there's never before been a global ledger that could accurately account for a variety of assets in any meaningfully-scalable way.

Swaps being "automatically cancelled" is a bit of a mathematical abstraction, but I can't think of another way to explain it simply.

src: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=193281.0
JFWooten4 and others added 4 commits September 13, 2024 14:07
Can I just take a minute to say how mind-boggling it is that MtGox is referenced on the Wikipedia page for OBs?
JFWooten4 added a commit to JFWooten4/free-markets that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants