feat(rulesets): add AsyncAPI v3 support

[jonaslagoni]

Fixes #2559.

Checklist

• Tests added / updated
• Docs added / updated

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Additional context

Does not update the following rules:

• asyncapi-message-examples
• asyncapi-message-messageId-uniqueness
• asyncapi-operation-operationId-uniqueness
• asyncapi-operation-security
• asyncapi-schema-default (does technically not work correctly, as it does not check default across all schemas i.e. message payloads)
• asyncapi-schema-examples (does technically not work correctly, as it does not check default across all schemas i.e. message payloads)
• asyncapi-payload (require custom function to tune out multi-format schema objects as schemaFormat is no longer part of message)
• asyncapi-payload-default (require custom function to tune out multi-format schema objects as schemaFormat is no longer part of message)
• asyncapi-payload-examples(require custom function to tune out multi-format schema objects as schemaFormat is no longer part of message)
• asyncapi-operation-operationId (No longer relevant)

Limits to rules:

• asyncapi-3-payload-unsupported-schemaFormat - Does not apply for multi-format schemas

[jonaslagoni]

The last CircleCI test are simply timing out, no idea how to fix that.

All ready to be reviewed.

[frankkilcommins]

Looking good so far. Some minor remarks:

• Formats Package:
  • Bump package version to 1.8.0
  • Update deps in consuming packages: functions, ruleset-bundler, rulesets, and core (devDependencies)
• Rulesets Package:
  • Bump package version to 1.21.0

[jonaslagoni]

@frankkilcommins are those not automatically bumped on release? 🤔

[jonaslagoni]

Alright, updated dependencies, but I am getting some weird dependency problems in code I have not touched...

Any suggestions?

[frankkilcommins]

@frankkilcommins are those not automatically bumped on release? 🤔

Oh maybe - I've not seen the release job but I manually bumped when adding Arazzo core rulesets. @mnaumanali94 can you confirm.

[mnaumanali94]

@frankkilcommins semantic-release does bump it automatically if the commit messages are done right.

[jonaslagoni]

So I guess I revert the manual version bumping? 🤔

Anything else that needs to happen?

[mnaumanali94]

@jonaslagoni I have fixed the CI - There are some conflicts in docs, so if you can fix those and merge the develop branch, the checks should pass.

So I guess I revert the manual version bumping? 🤔

Yes that should be it.

[jonaslagoni]

@jonaslagoni I have fixed the CI - There are some conflicts in docs, so if you can fix those and merge the develop branch, the checks should pass.

So I guess I revert the manual version bumping? 🤔

Yes that should be it.

All good, looking at it tomorrow most likely ✌️

[jonaslagoni]

All ready ✌️ @mnaumanali94 @frankkilcommins

[msolujic]

thanks @frankkilcommins
which version of spectral this will be part of?

[frankkilcommins]

@msolujic we hope to include in the next release. We should get that out the door over the next week or so.

cc @mnaumanali94

[dilanka-cacib]

Hi,

Do you have ETA to release this feature?
I can see you have updated your doc with new v3 rules but I cannot see those rules in @stoplight/spectral-rulesets

Thanks,