-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 940
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
* feat: third party custom providers - New configuration option `third_party.custom_providers`. `custom_providers` is a map of arbitrarily chosen keys to a `CustomThirdPartyProvider` - this is implemented as a new type differing from the existing configuration type `ThirdPartyProvider` used for built-in providers because they have different configuration requirements. - Both `ThirdPartyProvider` and `CustomThirdPartyProvider` types get a non- configurable, automatically populated `Name` (during the config's `PostProcess`) that sort of serves as an identifier/slug for the provider in order to distinguish provider types at runtime. - A `CustomThirdPartyProvider`s `Name` is automatically prefixed during `PostProcess` with a "custom_" prefix to ensure that providers can be distinguished at runtime. - A (built-in) `ThirdPartyProvider`s `Name` is "hard-coded" through the `DefaultConfig`. - Built-in OAuth/OIDC provider implementations are currently instantiated on-demand instead of once at appliation startup (i.e. unlike SAML providers) - i.e. when a user requests auth/authz with a third party provider, only then a provider is instantiated and created via factory function (`thirdparty.GetProvider`). Custom providers follow this pattern, hence the factory function had to be adjusted to take into account providers with the aforementioned "custom_" prefix (i.e.: if it is a "custom_" provider, instantiate a `customProvider` implementation). - The `customProvider` implementation uses the `go-oidc` library. Instances of providers of the type this library offers can be instantiated by passing in an `issuer` URL. Such an instantiation automatically attempts to retrieve an OIDC discovery document from a `.well-known` endpoint. This also performs an issuer validation. Providers configured to not use OIDC discovery (i.e. `use_discovery` in the `CustomThirdPartyProvider` is `false` or omitted) do not do this issuer check. - The `customProvider` implementation is further based on the assumption that provider user data is only extracted from a userinfo endpoint response, i.e. in case of an OIDC provider, the implementation does not make use of the ID token - no validation is performed on the ID token. - The `customProvider` implementation requires configuring a list of `scopes`: because the custom providers allow configuring both OAuth as well as OIDC providers, we cannot simply set a default set of scopes, e.g. `openid`, which is a required claim for OIDC - some providers return errors on unknown claims so setting this would make the third party auth process prone to errors. - The `customProvider` implementation allows for a simple mapping of claims contained in the userinfo response from the provider to "known" standard OIDC conformant claims at the Hanko backend (defined in the `thirdparty.Claims` struct) through an `attribute_mapping` configuration option. The mapping is a simple one-to-one mapping, i.e. no complex mapping instructions are possible, e.g. mapping concatenations of multiple claims in the provider data source or similar. Any other non-standard claims returned by the provider are placed in a `custom_claims` attribute. Except for the user ID (`sub`), `email` and `email_verified` claims the third party functionality currently does not allow accessing this user data but there's a good chance this will change in the future, so I tried to make sure that any info retrieved from the provider is somehow preserved (it is persisted in the `data` column for an `identity` btw. and updated on every login with the provider). - I also noticed that the `thirdparty.Claims` were missing the `address` claim, so I added that for completeness' sake. - The changes also fix a "bug" in the account `linking` logic whereby third party connections were established by simply assuming that the email retrieved from the provider was verified. So, even if the email address at the provider was not verified (or the provider simply did/does not provide info about the verification status) an account was created and/or linked and the flow API capabilities of automatically triggering a passcode if the backend was configured to require email verification would not take effect. This was a wrong assumption and the verification status is now based on the actual value retrieved from the provider. - In case of a triggered passcode, the changes also modify the token exchange action to prevent showing a `back` button/link, since it does not make sense to go `back` to anything right after the token exchange - there is nothing to go "back" to.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
2cf5b3d
commit 455e8e3
Showing
25 changed files
with
616 additions
and
124 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.