Customer Request #219777 [BE][WEB ADMIN] : Remove time validation for the events to mark the attendance

[Tusharmahajan12]

https://tracker.tekdi.net/issues/219777

I have ensured that following Pull Request Checklist is taken care of before sending this PR

• Code is formatted as per format decided
• Updated acceptance criteria in tracker
• Updated test cases in test-cases-tracker
• Updated new API endpoint if any in common postman collection
• Updated DB changes in db-tracker if any

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved event data fetching by removing unnecessary conditions related to start_time and end_time, ensuring more accurate and efficient retrieval of event aggregates.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent update to the EventsService class in events.service.ts involves modifying the query within the data object. Specifically, the conditions related to start_time and end_time have been removed from the events_aggregate query. This change aims to simplify the query and possibly broaden the scope of the event data being fetched.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
src/.../events.service.ts	Modified the data object query in EventsService by removing conditions related to start_time and end_time in the events_aggregate query.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)

src/src/events/events.service.ts (3)

Line range hint 31-123: Refactor the create method to improve maintainability.

Consider breaking down this method into smaller functions, each handling a specific part of the event creation process, such as date conversion, validation, and data assembly. This will enhance readability and maintainability.

---

Line range hint 125-250: Refactor the update method to enhance code clarity.

Similar to the create method, consider decomposing this method into smaller, focused functions that handle specific parts of the event update process. This will make the code easier to understand and maintain.

---

Line range hint 252-300: Ensure robust error handling in the remove method.

Consider adding more comprehensive error handling to manage potential failures during the deletion process, such as failed promises or database errors.

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a0f58b4 and 660b66a.

Files selected for processing (1)

• src/src/events/events.service.ts (1 hunks)

Additional Context Used

Path-based Instructions (1)

src/src/events/events.service.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: "Review the JavaScript code for conformity with the Google JavaScript style guide, highlighting any deviations. Ensure that:

• The code adheres to best practices associated with nodejs.
• The code adheres to best practices associated with nestjs framework.
• The code adheres to best practices recommended for performance.
• The code adheres to similar naming conventions for controllers, models, services, methods, variables."

Additional comments not posted (1)

src/src/events/events.service.ts (1)

657-657: Verify the impact of removing time constraints in fetchEventAggregates.

Consider adding a comment in the code explaining why the time constraints were removed to maintain clarity for future maintainers.