Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Turn chronyd module into a short prerequisite #3345

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

asteflova
Copy link
Member

@asteflova asteflova commented Oct 3, 2024

What changes are you introducing?

Dropping the module to configure chronyd and replacing it with a short prerequisite.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

chronyd is installed and enabled by default, a short prerequisite is enough. See also https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-27943

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

This PR also removes the module on clock sync from Configuring Load Balancing. I don't think that's a problem because the assembly in that guide links to Installing Proxy where the new prerequisite is listed.

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • Foreman 3.6/Katello 4.8
  • Foreman 3.5/Katello 4.7 (Satellite 6.13; orcharhino 6.6/6.7)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.5.

@asteflova asteflova added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM style-wise

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Oct 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style-wise still LGTM

@asteflova asteflova added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective and removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective labels Oct 4, 2024
@asteflova asteflova merged commit f21fc89 into theforeman:master Oct 4, 2024
9 checks passed
@asteflova asteflova deleted the SAT-27943_time_sync branch October 4, 2024 18:25
asteflova added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
The prerequisite avoids mentioning any specific timekeeping protocol (previously: NTP) or service (previously: chronyd) because these are not the only options.

(cherry picked from commit f21fc89)
@asteflova
Copy link
Member Author

Merged to "master" and cherry-picked:

29e8954..7d6ab51 3.12 -> 3.12

asteflova added a commit to asteflova/foreman-documentation that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
The prerequisite avoids mentioning any specific timekeeping protocol (previously: NTP) or service (previously: chronyd) because these are not the only options.

(cherry picked from commit f21fc89)
asteflova added a commit to asteflova/foreman-documentation that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2024
The prerequisite avoids mentioning any specific timekeeping protocol (previously: NTP) or service (previously: chronyd) because these are not the only options.

(cherry picked from commit f21fc89)
asteflova added a commit to asteflova/foreman-documentation that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
The prerequisite avoids mentioning any specific timekeeping protocol (previously: NTP) or service (previously: chronyd) because these are not the only options.

(cherry picked from commit f21fc89)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants