Fix serialization of Nut model
#5
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ACK e15cc03, thanks for the fix.
This mint info endpoint needs work to be typesafe, particularly as this Method object is really defined differently for different NUTs, but that's work for future us. Glad to see the tests fixed.
|
@kirillzh would you mind rebasing before I merge? |
Doesn't look like there are any changes to rebase (tried locally) |
A serialization unit test was failing with ``` Unexpected JSON token at offset 170: Expected start of the array '[', but had '[' instead at path: $.nuts['4'].methods[0] ``` because response structure is different from the one used by `Nut`. Fix by introducing a `Method` model type as part of a `Nul` type matching actual json response structure.
thunderbiscuit
force-pushed
the
zhukov/fix-tests
branch
from
e15cc03 to
3fbd53d
Compare
|
Yeah sorry I just try to not merge any merge commits, so rebases are required, but if I let GitHub do the rebase through the big green merge/rebase button, I lose the GPG signature on your commit. So either people need to rebase themselves or I do the rebase, but then it adds me as an author to the commit, so I often let people rebase. |
A serialization unit test was failing with
because response structure is different from the one used by
Nut.Fix by introducing a
Methodmodel type as part of aNultype matching actual json response structure.