Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement change alerts on Manage Queues and Queue Manager pages (#157, #160, #163) #258

Draft
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ssciolla
Copy link
Contributor

@ssciolla ssciolla commented Dec 9, 2020

This PR introduces a front-end mechanism for tracking changes to certain entity types (so far, QueueBase, Meeting) that are updated by WebSocket connections. These changes seek to alert all users (including those with vision impairment) that contents of pages have changed without their doing anything, as well as provide confirmation in some cases that certain actions were successful (specifically, with meeting actions on the QueueManagerPage). Alerts are set to be visible for seven seconds before disappearing. The PR aims to resolve issues #157, #160, and #163.

@ssciolla ssciolla added enhancement New feature or request front end Involves changes to the front end (React) application and/or UI accessibility Involves changes intended to improve accessibility labels Dec 9, 2020
@ssciolla ssciolla requested a review from jlost December 9, 2020 17:59
@ssciolla
Copy link
Contributor Author

ssciolla commented Dec 9, 2020

@jlost, I think this is functional, but it may be too ambitious to try to squeeze it in this release. I thought I'd start the conversation about the code though so we can keep it moving forward.


// https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.15#xorWith

export function compareEntities<T extends Base> (oldOnes: T[], newOnes: T[]): string | undefined
Copy link
Contributor

@jlost jlost Jan 4, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Base can be a lot of things, but only the following types are supported in this function: Meeting, Queue. You could tighten up the typing here by further constraining your generic constraint to T extends Meeting|QueueBase.

Copy link
Contributor

@jlost jlost Jan 4, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could also say type ComparableEntity = Meeting | QueueBase then make this function non-generic, replacing T with ComparableEntity. The outcome would be the same. When I see a function that uses a generic type, my assumption is that it doesn't make any attempt to figure out anything else about the generic type's structure (IOW, as written I'd expect this function to care about properties in Base and nothing else). This comment could also sort of apply to the isUser checks in detectChanges, although that one is making an exception for a single type and is otherwise truly generic, so it's not as bad.

Copy link
Contributor

@jlost jlost Jan 4, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The other direction you could go in would be making these functions even more generic, factoring out the type checks somehow. I find that recusively comparing JS objects to diff them is a problem I run into surprisingly often, which makes me wonder if there are libraries. A cursory google search shows there are some, but I haven't tried them yet. They might be worth considering. Otherwise, if they don't look appropriate or it would take too much work to pay off, I think this general approach is OK.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice points, let me think this over and try out the changes you suggest.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ssciolla ssciolla Jan 4, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as packages, I've found:

Did you see any others? The first looks fairly reliable, though it hasn't been updated since 2018, and doesn't have TypeScript support. The second is much less widely used. Looking at the third...

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ssciolla ssciolla Jan 4, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could also say type ComparableEntity = Meeting | QueueBase then make this function non-generic, replacing T with ComparableEntity. The outcome would be the same.

I might be betraying my hazy understanding of generics, but question: is there any merit to keeping the generic because otherwise the function could allow oldOnes and newOnes to be different types of objects if their types are each ComparableEntity[]? In other words, does keeping the generic somehow require that the function receive arrays of objects with the same type in these two parameters?

Copy link
Contributor

@jlost jlost Jan 5, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hard to say which lib is best without doing a deep dive, but I tend to gravitate toward things that have more users, stars, contributors, etc. and flitbit/diff seems to have quite a lead there. Its types seem to be in @types/deep-diff.

is there any merit to keeping the generic because otherwise the function could allow oldOnes and newOnes to be different types

Absolutely, good point, keeping it generic makes sure both params are the same type.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ssciolla ssciolla Jan 5, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I must have missed something regarding TypeScript and deep-diff. That looks promising; I will investigate that further. deep-object-diff was a little unpredictable, and wasn't giving me enough info.

Regarding your ComparableEntity suggestion and generics, see commit 1bd1d20 . I elected to keep Base in models.ts, but I can remove it entirely if you want.

@ssciolla ssciolla force-pushed the issues-157-160-change-event-alerts branch from 66da283 to 54f18fc Compare January 4, 2021 20:32
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
"@fortawesome/fontawesome-svg-core": "^1.2.28",
"@fortawesome/free-solid-svg-icons": "^5.13.0",
"@fortawesome/react-fontawesome": "^0.1.9",
"lodash.isequal": "^4.5.0",
"lodash.xorwith": "^4.5.0",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd also be OK with including all of lodash, since I happen to like it and we have no need to economize on bundle size.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I'll get to this.

<Col md={12}>
<ChangeLog changeEvents={props.meetingChangeEvents} deleteChangeEvent={props.deleteMeetingChangeEvent} />
</Col>
</Row>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really a technical comment but a stray observation - since these are positioned toward the top, the rest of the page shifts downward a bit when they appear, which might cause misclicks. Not sure what the best way to handle that would be.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, yeah, tricky, it seemed like a simpler implementation to just always report them at the top, but they could be hidden from view or result in some page shifting if there are a lot of meetings in play.

src/assets/src/hooks/useEntityChanges.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/assets/src/hooks/useEntityChanges.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ssciolla ssciolla force-pushed the issues-157-160-change-event-alerts branch from 9172e52 to ba5614e Compare January 20, 2021 18:56
@jonespm jonespm marked this pull request as draft October 24, 2024 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accessibility Involves changes intended to improve accessibility enhancement New feature or request front end Involves changes to the front end (React) application and/or UI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants