pages*/osx/*: apply keypress specifications

[Managor]

#15798

These required a bit of trickery to find. I used various methods such as grep -r "<" | grep ">" | grep -v http | sort, grep -ri "ctrl", grep -ri "alt", grep -Er '`.`' and grep -Er '`[^\n]*[A-Z]+[^\n]*`', grep -ri "cmd", grep -ri "option"

Should the Ctrl keys be converted to the mac equivalent?

[Managor]

Should the Ctrl keys be converted to the mac equivalent?

[kant]

Spanish chapter: LGTM

[sebastiaanspeck]

Should the Ctrl keys be converted to the mac equivalent?

What is "the Mac equivalent" to you? The Option-key or the Command-key? Or anything else?

[Managor]

I don't know. That's why I'm asking and hoping someone more knowledgeable answers.
Judging by the translations Cmd seems to be Ctrl equivalent.

[sebastiaanspeck]

I don't know. That's why I'm asking and hoping someone more knowledgeable answers.

Judging by the translations Cmd seems to be Ctrl equivalent.

It's not. Cmd is the Windows-key, Option is the Alt-key and Control is the Ctrl-key.

[Managor]

I see. Are you on a mac? Can you test what keys caffeinate responds to?

[sebastiaanspeck]

I see. Are you on a mac? Can you test what keys caffeinate responds to?

I am. Give me a minute Edit: It just responds to Ctrl - c, So Control - c.

[Managor]

Is <Ctrl c> good enough for mac users or are you more used to <Control c>. I would prefer <Ctrl c> to reduce horizontal width, but I can't argue with platform specific notation.

Also make one commit suggestion so that you get credit when this gets squash merged.

[sebastiaanspeck]

Is <Ctrl c> good enough for mac users or are you more used to <Control c>. I would prefer <Ctrl c> to reduce horizontal width, but I can't argue with platform specific notation.

<Ctrl c> sounds good enough to me, although <Ctrl + c> looks the best to me.

Also make one commit suggestion so that you get credit when this gets squash merged.

I do not care that much about the credits for this work.

[tldr-bot]

Hello! I've noticed something unusual when checking this PR:

• The page pages.de/osx/caffeinate.md is outdated, based on number of commands, compared to the English page.
• The page pages.id/osx/caffeinate.md is outdated, based on number of commands, compared to the English page.
• The page pages.it/osx/caffeinate.md is outdated, based on number of commands, compared to the English page.
• The page pages.pl/osx/caffeinate.md is outdated, based on number of commands, compared to the English page.
• The page pages.zh/osx/caffeinate.md is outdated, based on number of commands, compared to the English page.

Is this intended? If so, just ignore this comment. Otherwise, please double-check the commits.