Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add perplexity completion example #977

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sklinkert
Copy link
Contributor

@sklinkert sklinkert commented Aug 3, 2024

This PR adds an example for using the perplexity API. The API is OpenAI client-compatible.

PR Checklist

  • Read the Contributing documentation.
  • Read the Code of conduct documentation.
  • Name your Pull Request title clearly, concisely, and prefixed with the name of the primarily affected package you changed according to Good commit messages (such as memory: add interfaces for X, Y or util: add whizzbang helpers).
  • Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
  • Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. Fixes #123).
  • Describes the source of new concepts.
  • References existing implementations as appropriate.
  • Contains test coverage for new functions.
  • Passes all golangci-lint checks.

@sklinkert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tmc can you please merge this? pretty straight-forward PR :)

let me know if something is missing!

Copy link
Owner

@tmc tmc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tmc tmc merged commit 5082762 into tmc:main Sep 13, 2024
3 checks passed
@sklinkert sklinkert deleted the perplexity-example branch September 21, 2024 09:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants