Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Load new model version should not reload loaded existing model … #390

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

kthui
Copy link
Contributor

@kthui kthui commented Aug 20, 2024

…version(s) (#388)

  • Do not reload unmodified loaded model version

  • Track model directory timestamps more granularly to detect updates to model version files

  • Rename model config util config change require reload function

  • Re-organize ModelTimestamp() and throw exception

  • Revert "Re-organize ModelTimestamp() and throw exception"

This reverts commit 41e57e5.

  • Break constructor into multiple functions

  • Comment on should raise an exception when failed to create timestamp

…version(s) (#388)

* Do not reload unmodified loaded model version

* Track model directory timestamps more granularly to detect updates to model version files

* Rename model config util config change require reload function

* Re-organize ModelTimestamp() and throw exception

* Revert "Re-organize ModelTimestamp() and throw exception"

This reverts commit 41e57e5.

* Break constructor into multiple functions

* Comment on should raise an exception when failed to create timestamp
@kthui
Copy link
Contributor Author

kthui commented Aug 20, 2024

Pick #388 into r24.08

@kthui kthui marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2024 19:54
@kthui kthui requested review from mc-nv and statiraju August 21, 2024 22:03
@nv-kmcgill53 nv-kmcgill53 merged commit d10fe80 into r24.08 Aug 21, 2024
1 check passed
@kthui kthui deleted the jacky-load-new-model-version-r24.08 branch October 22, 2024 00:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants