Language local #29
Merged
Language local #29
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this Pull Request do?
This PR makes it so that the properties "language" and "language_local" have different property URIs. The dbo:language (http://dbpedia.org/ontology/language) was selected.
How should this be tested?
Review property URI in RDF inquisitor. If the URI is not appropriate say why or suggest another. Check that this URI is not used elsewhere in the M3.
Comments
I also looked at http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/language but I wasn't sure the definition was a good fit ("The value for this element is added by the Data Ingestion Team as part of the ingestion process, based on the language of the data provider").
Interested parties
@markpbaggett