-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated RFCs process description to align with oneDPL #1612
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
rfcs/README.md
Outdated
A proposal that is subsequently implemented and released as an experimental feature | ||
is moved into the `rfcs/experimental` directory. | ||
The RFC for such a feature should include a description | ||
of what is required to move it from experimental to fully supported -- for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
of what is required to move it from experimental to fully supported -- for | |
of what is required to move it from experimental to fully supported - for |
The `rfcs/proposed` directory contains RFCs for approved proposals | ||
that need to be implemented. These documents describe the overall design | ||
and API for the proposed functionality. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to state somewhere that the RFC process (and the proposed
directory) can be used also for proposals containing only the idea and extended motivation, without stating the design and current API (at least on the initial stage)?
Or the idea is to use discussions for such cases?
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Boyarinov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Boyarinov <[email protected]>
Description
Add a comprehensive description of proposed changes
Fixes # - issue number(s) if exists
Type of change
Choose one or multiple, leave empty if none of the other choices apply
Add a respective label(s) to PR if you have permissions
Tests
Documentation
Breaks backward compatibility
Notify the following users
List users with
@
to send notificationsOther information