FIX: fixing spmd tests utilities for dpctl inputs

[samir-nasibli]

Description

DPCTL doesn't support some numpy-like ufunc functionality, For example, loop of ufunc does not support argument 0 of type dpctl.tensor._usmarray.usm_ndarray which has no callable conjugate method.

Make sense before some manipulations with resulted dpctl or any other non-numpy arrays convert to numpy before and do comparison with expected numpy arrays.

Found on #1861

---

Checklist to comply with before moving PR from draft:

PR completeness and readability

• I have reviewed my changes thoroughly before submitting this pull request.
• [] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• [] I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes or created a separate PR with update and provided its number in the description, if necessary.
• Git commit message contains an appropriate signed-off-by string (see CONTRIBUTING.md for details).
• I have added a respective label(s) to PR if I have a permission for that.
• I have resolved any merge conflicts that might occur with the base branch.

Testing

• The unit tests pass successfully.
• I have run it locally and tested the changes extensively.

Performance

• I have measured performance for affected algorithms using scikit-learn_bench and provided at least summary table with measured data, if performance change is expected.
• I have provided justification why performance has changed or why changes are not expected.

[samir-nasibli]

/intelci: run

[icfaust]

Small change in naming convention to keep it compact. Otherwise good to go.

[olegkkruglov]

LGTM, please make sure the naming dispute is settled

[samir-nasibli]

/intelci: run

[icfaust]

I approve. Just for posterity, and alternate solution as we have talked about elsewhere would have been to use get_namespace. This may be a better convention going forward than using parametrized numpy dtypes, assert(data.dtype == getattr(get_namespace(data)[0], dtype.__name__))

[samir-nasibli]

I approve. Just for posterity, and alternate solution as we have talked about elsewhere would have been to use get_namespace. This may be a better convention going forward than using parametrized numpy dtypes, assert(data.dtype == getattr(get_namespace(data)[0], dtype.__name__))

I think this less common for our primitives, so better to convert to one dataframe format then compare.

[samir-nasibli]

@mergify backport rls/2024.7.0-rls

[mergify]

backport rls/2024.7.0-rls

✅ Backports have been created

• #2020 FIX: fixing spmd tests utilities for dpctl inputs (backport #1999) has been created for branch rls/2024.7.0-rls