fix: react rules

[Nr9]

Fixes #

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Disabled the enforcement of display names for React components.
  • Removed the requirement for buttons to have explicit types defined, allowing for more flexibility in button usage.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the ESLint rules for React in the rules/react.mjs file by disabling the 'react/display-name' rule and removing the 'react/button-has-type' rule. These changes affect how components are linted, specifically regarding the enforcement of display names and button type specifications.

Changes

File	Change Summary
rules/react.mjs	- Added rule: 'react/display-name': 'off'
	- Removed rule: 'react/button-has-type'

Possibly related PRs

• chore: improve react configuration #69: This PR modifies the rules/react.mjs file, adding and adjusting several React linting rules, including the react/button-has-type rule, which is directly related to the removal of this rule in the main PR.
• fix: typescript @typescript-eslint/no-misused-promises rule #70: This PR also makes changes to the rules/react.mjs file, adding a new configuration block for TypeScript files and modifying existing rules, which includes the react/jsx-props-no-spreading, react/prop-types, and react/require-default-props, indicating a close relationship with the changes in the main PR.

Suggested labels

bug

Suggested reviewers

• jetre219
• jonathanpelletier

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
Display names have hopped away.
Buttons now can freely roam,
In our React, they find a home!
With linting rules so light and free,
Let’s code together, you and me! 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb5384c and c7c54b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• rules/react.mjs (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments not posted (2)

rules/react.mjs (2)

64-64: Verify the removal of 'react/button-has-type' rule.

The 'react/button-has-type' rule has been removed from the configuration. This rule typically enforces that button elements have an explicit 'type' attribute. By removing it:

Pros:

• Reduces strictness in button declarations, allowing for more flexible usage.
• May align with team preferences if explicit button types are not always necessary.

Cons:

• Could lead to accessibility issues if button types are omitted.
• May result in unexpected form submissions if 'type="submit"' is accidentally omitted.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce potential issues, let's verify the current usage of button types in the codebase:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for button usage without explicit types

# Test: Search for button elements without a type attribute
echo "Checking for buttons without explicit type:"
rg --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx '<button(?![^>]*type=)[^>]*>' -g '!**/node_modules/**'

# Test: Search for button elements with explicit types (for context)
echo "Checking for buttons with explicit type (for context):"
rg --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx '<button[^>]*type=[^>]*>' -g '!**/node_modules/**'

If the first search returns significant results, consider keeping the rule enabled or adding documentation about best practices for button usage in React components.

---

64-64: Consider the implications of disabling the 'react/display-name' rule.

The 'react/display-name' rule has been turned off. This rule typically enforces that all components have a display name, which can be helpful for debugging and testing. By disabling it:

Pros:

• Reduces boilerplate code in functional components.
• Aligns with modern React practices where display names are often inferred.

Cons:

• May make debugging more challenging in certain scenarios.
• Could impact some testing libraries that rely on display names.

To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the project, let's verify the usage of display names in the codebase:

If these searches return significant results, consider keeping the rule enabled or adding documentation about naming conventions for React components.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.