Opacity of tracks based on a score/mappability #460
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jmonlong
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was an idea to make it easier to distinguish separate tracks (with different assigned color palettes) and still visualize the mapq information by making the reads more transparent the lower the mapq. Right now, if we color by mapping quality, all the tracks get colored and we lose which path belong to which track.
I'm also using this option for "coverage" tracks to represent coverage level: the more opaque the higher the coverage.
Just a suggestion at this point. This was easy to add. Another harder option could be to provide a way for the user to define color palettes and/or color gradients for mapping quality.