Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

T6349: updated pr-labels workflow permission #3485

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 18, 2024

Conversation

kumvijaya
Copy link
Contributor

@kumvijaya kumvijaya commented May 18, 2024

Change Summary

Updated pr-labels workflow permission

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • Migration from an old Vyatta component to vyos-1x, please link to related PR inside obsoleted component
  • Other (please describe):

Related Task(s)

https://vyos.dev/T6349

Related PR(s)

Component(s) name

Proposed changes

How to test

Smoketest result

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • I have linked this PR to one or more Phabricator Task(s)
  • I have run the components SMOKETESTS if applicable
  • My commit headlines contain a valid Task id
  • My change requires a change to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

@kumvijaya kumvijaya changed the title T6349: updated pr-labels workflow permission and updated reusable wor… T6349: updated pr-labels workflow permission May 18, 2024
@sever-sever sever-sever requested review from a team, dmbaturin, sarthurdev, zdc, jestabro and c-po and removed request for a team May 18, 2024 17:29
@c-po c-po merged commit 65c8e9e into current May 18, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@jestabro jestabro mentioned this pull request May 19, 2024
12 tasks
@kumvijaya kumvijaya deleted the bugfix/T6349-workflow-permissions-fix branch May 25, 2024 08:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants