-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 791
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat[venom]: store expansion pass #4068
Open
charles-cooper
wants to merge
27
commits into
vyperlang:master
Choose a base branch
from
charles-cooper:feat/store-expansion
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
feat[venom]: store expansion pass #4068
charles-cooper
wants to merge
27
commits into
vyperlang:master
from
charles-cooper:feat/store-expansion
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
extract IRLiterals which are instruction arguments; this reduces pressure on the stack scheduler
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4068 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.36% 90.15% -1.21%
==========================================
Files 108 109 +1
Lines 15637 15687 +50
Branches 3440 3448 +8
==========================================
- Hits 14287 14143 -144
- Misses 920 1067 +147
- Partials 430 477 +47
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
charles-cooper
changed the title
feat: store expansion pass
feat[venom]: store expansion pass
Sep 25, 2024
also incidentally fixes #4215 |
they do pretty much the same things
we no longer need to keep track of emitted ops
it no longer changes bytecode
use equivalence analysis to reduce swaps
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did
expand extract_literals pass to also extract variables, allowing for more degrees of freedom in the dft pass
How I did it
How to verify it
Commit message
Commit message for the final, squashed PR. (Optional, but reviewers will appreciate it! Please see our commit message style guide for what we would ideally like to see in a commit message.)
Description for the changelog
Cute Animal Picture