Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QMDB Core Integration for the proof storage engine within Substrate #2495

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

BNKSYSA
Copy link

@BNKSYSA BNKSYSA commented Jan 29, 2025

Project Abstract

This project focuses on the QMDB integration as the proof storage engine within Substrate, specifically implementing core storage functionality without iterators and prefixes with limited support or non-optimal support.

Grant level

  • Level 1: Up to $10,000, 2 approvals
  • Level 2: Up to $30,000, 3 approvals
  • Level 3: Unlimited, 5 approvals (for >$100k: Web3 Foundation Council approval)

Application Checklist

  • The application template has been copied and aptly renamed (QF_QMDB-substrate-part1.md).
  • I have read the application guidelines.
  • Payment details have been provided (Polkadot AssetHub (USDC & DOT) address in the application and bank details via email, if applicable).
  • I understand that an agreed upon percentage of each milestone will be paid in vested DOT, to the Polkadot address listed in the application.
  • I am aware that, in order to receive a grant, I (and the entity I represent) have to successfully complete a KYC/KYB check.
  • The software delivered for this grant will be released under an open-source license specified in the application.
  • The initial PR contains only one commit (squash and force-push if needed).
  • The grant will only be announced once the first milestone has been accepted (see the announcement guidelines).
  • I prefer the discussion of this application to take place in a private Element/Matrix channel. My username is: @sergecher:matrix.org (change the homeserver if you use a different one)

BNKSYSA and others added 3 commits January 29, 2025 15:21
Grant Application - QMDB Core Integration for Substrate Storage Enhancement
QMDB Core Integration for Substrate Storage Enhancement
@github-actions github-actions bot added the admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. label Jan 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2025

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@BNKSYSA
Copy link
Author

BNKSYSA commented Jan 29, 2025

I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement.

@BNKSYSA
Copy link
Author

BNKSYSA commented Jan 30, 2025

@semuelle hi, could you please help with the failing check - Enforce PR labels?

@keeganquigley keeganquigley changed the title QMDB Core Integration fas the proof storage engine within Substrate QMDB Core Integration for the proof storage engine within Substrate Jan 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@keeganquigley keeganquigley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the application @BNKSYSA don't worry about the failed checks, we will take care of them. Out of curiosity, have you discussed any of these findings or hypothesis with the W3F research team? As there are currently multiple teams working on storage solutions. If I understand correctly, this research would only apply to parachains and not the relay chain?

Additionally, the PolkaHub project you mentioned seems to have not been maintained over the last five years, and the website is down. Has your team been active in Polkadot as of late?

I noticed that the litepaper is pretty outdated in some parts. For example, the links in the SDK section: Chainsafe's MetaMask snap for Polkadot has been sunsetted and the repo is now archived. Polkascan.org was also discontinued as of March 2024. There are also multiple API alternatives to polkadot.js now such as PAPI and Dedot. I'd suggest giving the paper an update.

Let me know if you're able to provide any additional details here and have a great weekend.

@keeganquigley keeganquigley added the changes requested The team needs to clarify a few things first. label Jan 31, 2025
@BNKSYSA
Copy link
Author

BNKSYSA commented Feb 3, 2025

Thank you @keeganquigley for your questions and comments on the application. I apologize, we had some internal team misalignment regarding this submission. We'll withdraw the application for now and return with it later.

@BNKSYSA BNKSYSA marked this pull request as draft February 3, 2025 11:58
@BNKSYSA BNKSYSA closed this Feb 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. changes requested The team needs to clarify a few things first.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants