Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add FAQ on injunctions/equitable-remedies clauses
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
kemitchell committed Mar 5, 2023
1 parent 44987c8 commit 3d90b32
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 0 deletions.
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions index.mustache.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ <h3 id=promote>How can I help promote the {{name}}?</h3>
<p>You can save this image to your computer, or copy and paste this HTML code:</p>
<textarea class=code>&lt;a href="https://{{domain}}"&gt;&lt;img src="https://{{domain}}/badge.png" alt="Waypoint NDA accepted here"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</textarea>

<h3 id=injunctions>Why doesn’t Waypoint have an injunction clause / irreparable harms stipulation / equitable remedies provision?</h3>
<p>Many business people and even lawyers believe these clauses work as described. They usually don’t, especially in US federal courts. Even where the odd court does honor as written, that’s often for the worse, speeding up injunctions just a bit while creating huge abuse potential.</p>
<p>Even Delaware courts, which tend to give these stipulations more weight, still require showing irreparable injury. For example, see the Court of Chancery’s February 19, 2016 order in the <em>AM General Holdings v. The Renco Group</em> cases, case numbers 7639-VNC and 7668-VCN.</p>
<h3 id=formats>Is the form available in other formats?</h3>
<p>Yes. Please mind <a href=/license>the license for the terms</a> when making changes.</p>
<table>
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 3d90b32

Please sign in to comment.