Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix understated ipnet version requirement #521

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2023

Conversation

scottlamb
Copy link
Contributor

webrtc-util uses IpNet::with_netmask, which was introduced in version 2.6.0. If someone is using a Cargo.lock with an older version of ipnet, they'll get a compile error when introducing webrtc-util (or upgrading it to after this call was added). Adding the correct version requirement in Cargo.toml forces the upgrade to fix this.

`webrtc-util` uses `IpNet::with_netmask`, which was introduced in
version 2.6.0. If someone is using a `Cargo.lock` with an older version of
`ipnet`, they'll get a compile error when introducing `webrtc-util` (or
upgrading it to after this call was added). Adding the correct version
requirement in `Cargo.toml` forces the upgrade to fix this.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 30, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (23d2e60) 61.52% compared to head (00787ad) 61.53%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #521   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.52%   61.53%           
=======================================
  Files         529      529           
  Lines       48855    48859    +4     
  Branches    12369    12381   +12     
=======================================
+ Hits        30060    30063    +3     
+ Misses       9589     9587    -2     
- Partials     9206     9209    +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yngrtc yngrtc merged commit 0dbdbf9 into webrtc-rs:master Dec 30, 2023
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants