Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: use leading and trailing surrogate #309

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

annevk
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk commented Apr 5, 2023

Also introduce an operation to obtain a scalar value from surrogates.

Eventually the lead/trail byte stuff needs to be made consistent with this as well.


Preview | Diff

Copy link
Collaborator

@ricea ricea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only the title says "pending surrogate"; should that be "trailing surrogate" instead?

encoding.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@annevk annevk changed the title Editorial: use leading and pending surrogate Editorial: use leading and trailing surrogate Oct 4, 2024
@annevk annevk requested a review from ricea October 4, 2024 09:30
Copy link
Collaborator

@ricea ricea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@annevk annevk merged commit 68f9e52 into main Oct 4, 2024
2 checks passed
@annevk annevk deleted the annevk/leading-trailing branch October 4, 2024 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants