-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Editorial: Refer to ECMA-262 as JavaScript rather than ECMAScript #1379
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for tackling this @jeremyroman!
index.bs
Outdated
@@ -1533,7 +1535,7 @@ on which they appear. It is language binding specific whether | |||
}; | |||
</pre> | |||
|
|||
the constant value can be accessed in ECMAScript either as | |||
the constant value can be accessed in JavaScript either as |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the constant value can be accessed in JavaScript either as | |
the constant value can be accessed in JavaScript either as |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
@@ -6964,11 +6967,11 @@ to its caller, and so on. | |||
</div> | |||
|
|||
|
|||
<h3 id="es-environment">ECMAScript environment</h3> | |||
<h3 id="js-environment" oldids="es-environment">JavaScript environment</h3> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think keeping the old IDs and not adding new IDs would be fine as well. I personally prefer that as it shows the document has some history.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's some history of using oldids
(e.g., adding es-undefined
and adding es-void
as an old ID, when WebIDL renamed the concept of void
). If the consensus is that we should continue to use es-
for IDs then I can unwind that, though.
We should add "Fixes #863." to the end of the final commit message. (Seems PR Preview won the race a couple times there.) |
This is consistent with how the HTML Living Standard, also a a WHATWG work product, refers to it and is how most developers would be familiar with it.
Included in this change:
Fixes #863.
Preview | Diff