feat: use entity derive macros for tables with hex ids [WPB-15434]

[SimonThormeyer]

What's new in this PR

Subtask of the above item, creating a separate PR to avoid large changeset

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title
  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	simon/feat/entity-derive-macro-second-iteration
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	milliseconds (ms)
Commit add f(group size)/cs1/mem/1002	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	19.60
Commit add f(group size)/cs1/mem/2	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	6.88
Commit add f(group size)/cs1/mem/202	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	9.60
Commit add f(group size)/cs1/mem/402	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	11.96
Commit add f(group size)/cs1/mem/602	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	14.85
Commit add f(group size)/cs1/mem/802	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	17.53
Commit add f(number clients)/cs1/mem/1002	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	990.26
Commit add f(number clients)/cs1/mem/2	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	6.97
Commit add f(number clients)/cs1/mem/202	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	85.14
Commit add f(number clients)/cs1/mem/402	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	221.84
Commit add f(number clients)/cs1/mem/602	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	428.83
Commit add f(number clients)/cs1/mem/802	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	676.59
Commit pending proposals f(group size)/cs1/mem/1002	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	116.74
Commit pending proposals f(group size)/cs1/mem/2	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	28.55
Commit pending proposals f(group size)/cs1/mem/202	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	45.81
Commit pending proposals f(group size)/cs1/mem/402	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	60.96
Commit pending proposals f(group size)/cs1/mem/602	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	79.81
Commit pending proposals f(group size)/cs1/mem/802	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	94.69
Commit pending proposals f(pending size)/cs1/mem/1	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	19.12
Commit pending proposals f(pending size)/cs1/mem/101	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	115.40
Commit pending proposals f(pending size)/cs1/mem/21	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	35.95
Commit pending proposals f(pending size)/cs1/mem/41	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	57.37
Commit pending proposals f(pending size)/cs1/mem/61	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	75.86
Commit pending proposals f(pending size)/cs1/mem/81	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	98.69
Commit remove f(group size)/cs1/mem/1002	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	28.99
Commit remove f(group size)/cs1/mem/2	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	6.78
Commit remove f(group size)/cs1/mem/202	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	9.02
Commit remove f(group size)/cs1/mem/402	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	12.06
Commit remove f(group size)/cs1/mem/602	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	17.86
Commit remove f(group size)/cs1/mem/802	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	23.38
Commit remove f(number clients)/cs1/mem/1002	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	33.07
Commit remove f(number clients)/cs1/mem/2	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	138.03
Commit remove f(number clients)/cs1/mem/202	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	115.86
Commit remove f(number clients)/cs1/mem/402	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	94.14
Commit remove f(number clients)/cs1/mem/602	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	73.07
Commit remove f(number clients)/cs1/mem/802	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	51.85
Commit update f(group size)/cs1/mem/1002	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	137.46
Commit update f(group size)/cs1/mem/2	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	7.19
Commit update f(group size)/cs1/mem/202	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	33.81
Commit update f(group size)/cs1/mem/402	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	59.64
Commit update f(group size)/cs1/mem/602	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	87.02
Commit update f(group size)/cs1/mem/802	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	112.10

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.10811% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.21%. Comparing base (1bece57) to head (1afca7d).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crypto-macros/src/entity_derive/parse.rs	73.21%	15 Missing ⚠️
crypto-macros/src/entity_derive/derive_impl.rs	94.44%	6 Missing ⚠️
keystore/src/lib.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #904      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.40%   78.21%   -0.19%     
==========================================
  Files         113      111       -2     
  Lines       20166    19971     -195     
==========================================
- Hits        15811    15621     -190     
+ Misses       4355     4350       -5     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
crypto-macros/src/entity_derive/mod.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
keystore/src/entities/mls.rs	66.66% <100.00%> (ø)
...eystore/src/entities/platform/generic/mls/group.rs	0.00% <ø> (-68.00%)	⬇️
keystore/src/error.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
keystore/src/transaction/dynamic_dispatch.rs	92.59% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
keystore/src/lib.rs	24.24% <0.00%> (ø)
crypto-macros/src/entity_derive/derive_impl.rs	98.44% <94.44%> (-1.56%)	⬇️
crypto-macros/src/entity_derive/parse.rs	82.69% <73.21%> (-4.59%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1bece57...1afca7d. Read the comment docs.

[coriolinus]

Looks good! I only manually looked over the derived implementations for PersistedMlsGroup, but that one seemed very reasonable.