refactor: convert ForegroundNotificationDetailsProvider to fun interface

[kl3jvi]

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

Briefly describe the issue you have solved or implemented with this pull request. If the PR contains multiple issues, use a bullet list.

Causes (Optional)

Briefly describe the causes behind the issues. This could be helpful to understand the adopted solutions behind some nasty bugs or complex issues.

Solutions

Briefly describe the solutions you have implemented for the issues explained above.

Dependencies (Optional)

If there are some other pull requests related to this one (e.g. new releases of frameworks), specify them here.

Needs releases with:

• GitHub link to other pull request

Testing

Test Coverage (Optional)

• I have added automated test to this contribution

How to Test

Briefly describe how this change was tested and if applicable the exact steps taken to verify that it works as expected.

Notes (Optional)

Specify here any other facts that you think are important for this issue.

Attachments (Optional)

Attachments like images, videos, etc. (drag and drop in the text box)

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.01%. Comparing base (94d387e) to head (b7a972a).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3070      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    54.02%   54.01%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         1232     1232              
  Lines        35979    35979              
  Branches      3646     3646              
===========================================
- Hits         19436    19433       -3     
- Misses       15141    15143       +2     
- Partials      1402     1403       +1     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 94d387e...b7a972a. Read the comment docs.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
• JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles

[kl3jvi]

@vitorhugods Anything else I can do for this PR?

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[vitorhugods]

@vitorhugods Anything else I can do for this PR?

No no, it's alright.
Because of our broken checks for PRs coming from forks this also makes it trickier on our side. We'd usually just add to the merge queue and have it merged easily.

I'll trigger the tests now, and if they succeed I'll just merge manually.