Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/et 18017 #2507

Closed

Conversation

robrichardson13
Copy link

No description provided.

@withfig-bot
Copy link
Collaborator


Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.


I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA


You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

@withfig-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @robrichardson13,
thank you very much for creating a Pull Request!
Here is a small checklist to get this PR merged as quickly as possible:

  • Do all subcommands / options which take arguments include the args property (args: {})?
  • Are all options modular? E.g. -a -u -x instead of -aux
  • Have all other checks passed?

Please add a 👍 as a reaction to this comment to show that you read this.

@robrichardson13 robrichardson13 deleted the feature/ET-18017 branch November 16, 2024 16:32
@withfig withfig locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 16, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants