-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 980
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update wp cli info
#4613
update wp cli info
#4613
Conversation
change output format to table
fix tests
I wonder if people use the output from |
Yes, apologies for the misleading comment @thrijith, although the output does look a lot better (though could do without the header). Please note this isn't a high priority at the moment so won't be reviewed immediately and may not make 1.5.0. |
ok @schlessera |
no problem @gitlost will remove the header. |
@thrijith if instead you have time to investigate wp-cli/scaffold-command#109 and whether the output is compliant in other cases apart from the taxonomy one you fixed that would very much be appreciated! |
ok @gitlost will work on it then |
@thrijith am going to leave this PR out of 1.5.0 but will revisit shortly afterwards, ta! |
@thrijith re headerless table, at the moment need to workaround limitations of
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for sticking with this @thrijith ! Although technically a BC break I think anyone who is parsing this is hopefully using the json format.
(One would have to agree with code climate though that this function could do with a bit of a refactor - the json and table paths should share and return the same data (with different keys) for instance. Also getting the shell should probably be put in a new Utils
function. But these are for another day!)
to update #4599
change output format to table : #4604 (comment)
not sure if this is what you expected @gitlost, please provide your inputs for any changes.