Improve performance of transeq on OpenMP backend #132
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Nanoseb
requested changes
Dec 10, 2024
So the assumption is not anything new in the fused implementation, it is because of the distributed algorithm and it would result in identical behaviour with non-fused basic implementation too. @Nanoseb |
Ah ok, sure. Then it sounds good, specially with the issue you created. |
Nanoseb
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2024
ia267
pushed a commit
to ia267/x3d2
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2025
Improve performance of transeq on OpenMP backend
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #66, implemented the third option as described in the issue.