Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Retain Webconfig root version to POST-NONE to handle NONE-REBOOT cases #226

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

nlrcomcast
Copy link
Contributor

@nlrcomcast nlrcomcast commented Feb 23, 2024

RDKB-53817:Retain Webconfig root version to POST-NONE to handle NONE-REBOOT cases

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (cd22bce) to head (0188393).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #226      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.98%   89.77%   -0.22%     
==========================================
  Files          38       38              
  Lines       10939    10939              
==========================================
- Hits         9844     9821      -23     
- Misses       1095     1118      +23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

src/webcfg_multipart.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nlrcomcast nlrcomcast changed the title Retain webconfig Retain Webconfig root version to POST-NONE to handle NONE-REBOOT cases Feb 26, 2024
@nlrcomcast nlrcomcast changed the title Retain Webconfig root version to POST-NONE to handle NONE-REBOOT cases Removing POST-NONE for FR, and Added Post none retain header Feb 26, 2024
@sadhyama sadhyama changed the title Removing POST-NONE for FR, and Added Post none retain header Retain Webconfig root version to POST-NONE to handle NONE-REBOOT cases Feb 29, 2024
@sadhyama sadhyama merged commit d46b2b2 into xmidt-org:master Feb 29, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants