Add LoggingMisbehaviorService #413
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@neekolas has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughA new Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant MisbehaviorService
participant Logger
Client->>MisbehaviorService: SafetyFailure(report)
MisbehaviorService->>Logger: Log misbehavior details
Logger-->>MisbehaviorService: Logging complete
MisbehaviorService-->>Client: Return nil
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/misbehavior/interface.go (1)
3-6: Add interface documentation.The interface looks good, but could benefit from documentation explaining its purpose and contract. Consider adding a comment describing:
- The purpose of this service
- What constitutes a safety failure
- Expected behavior when SafetyFailure is called
+// MisbehaviorService defines the contract for handling node misbehavior in the system. +// Implementations of this interface are responsible for processing and responding to +// various types of misbehavior reports. type MisbehaviorService interface { + // SafetyFailure handles reports of safety violations by nodes in the system. + // It returns an error if the report cannot be processed. SafetyFailure(report *SafetyFailureReport) error // TODO:nm add liveness failures }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
pkg/misbehavior/interface.go(1 hunks)pkg/misbehavior/misbehavior.go(1 hunks)pkg/misbehavior/misbehavior_test.go(1 hunks)pkg/misbehavior/report.go(1 hunks)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pkg/misbehavior/interface.go (1)
3-6: Consider documenting the interface and method.The interface looks clean and focused, but adding documentation would help explain:
- The purpose of MisbehaviorService
- What constitutes a safety failure
- The expected behavior when SafetyFailure returns an error
Also, regarding the TODO comment - would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the addition of liveness failures?
pkg/misbehavior/report.go (1)
8-13: Consider adding field documentation and accessor methods.The struct fields are unexported which provides good encapsulation, but:
- Add documentation for each field explaining its purpose
- Consider adding getter methods since the fields are unexported but likely needed by consumers
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
pkg/misbehavior/interface.go(1 hunks)pkg/misbehavior/misbehavior.go(1 hunks)pkg/misbehavior/misbehavior_test.go(1 hunks)pkg/misbehavior/report.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pkg/misbehavior/misbehavior.go (1)
7-17: LGTM! Good use of named logger.The type documentation and constructor implementation look clean and follow best practices.
neekolas
force-pushed
the
01-15-add_loggingmisbehaviorservice
branch
from
8bdd8b9 to
c5226fd
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
01-15-add_loggingmisbehaviorservice
branch
from
c5226fd to
6443a91
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
01-15-add_loggingmisbehaviorservice
branch
from
6443a91 to
7666a1b
Compare
TL;DR
Introduces a very-lightweight misbehavior reporting system that simply logs the misbehavior reports in a structured format.
This can be used in tests, and deployed to nodes. We will eventually replace this with a system that saves misbehavior reports to the DB.
What changed?
misbehaviorpackage with interfaces and implementations for handling node misbehaviorSafetyFailureReportstructure to capture details about safety violationsLoggingMisbehaviorServicethat logs misbehavior reports with relevant metadataHow to test?
misbehavior_test.goWhy make this change?
To establish a foundation for detecting and handling node misbehavior in the network, particularly focusing on safety violations. This system will help maintain network integrity by tracking and logging suspicious activities, with future expansion planned for handling liveness failures.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
MisbehaviorServiceinterface for handling safety failuresLoggingMisbehaviorServiceto log misbehavior reportsSafetyFailureReportto capture details of node misbehaviorTests
The changes enhance the system's ability to detect, log, and report node misbehavior with a structured approach.