Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XEP-0198: Clarify server enabling SM without requested resumption #1376

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

guusdk
Copy link
Contributor

@guusdk guusdk commented Aug 21, 2024

When a client requests stream management to be enabled and asks for stream resumption, it's not unreasonable for people to assume that the server may 'fail' the request if it doesn't offer the requested resumption. The pre-existing test does allow the server to enable SM without the requested resumption feature, but isn't overly clear.

This commit adds a note clarifying this scenario (and provides a rationale).

This was discussed briefly in the XSF Discussion MUC.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Needs Council The affected XEP has the Council as Approving Body and it needs to decide on the change. label Aug 21, 2024
When a client requests stream management to be enabled and asks for stream resumption, it's not unreasonable for people to assume that the server may 'fail' the request if it doesn't offer the requested resumption. The pre-existing test does allow the server to enable SM _without_ the requested resumption feature, but isn't overly clear.

This commit adds an example clarifying this scenario.
@guusdk guusdk force-pushed the XEP-0198_5_Enable-without-resumption branch from 26710a0 to 3a6253f Compare September 24, 2024 09:23
@iNPUTmice iNPUTmice merged commit 8fb357d into xsf:master Oct 14, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs Council The affected XEP has the Council as Approving Body and it needs to decide on the change.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants