-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 556
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYSIWYG by default #3694
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2360eec
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 8ba454d
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 8306db2
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 c2fbd00
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 7ac4b35
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 368e04a
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 14dee2d
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 c90ab7e
Merge branch 'xwiki:master' into XWIKI-17664
Sereza7 10d3272
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 359f650
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 b7d3008
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 27ead97
XWIKI-17664: When adding an annotation the focus should be inside WYS…
Sereza7 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm wondering if we shouldn't make his a bit more generic / extensible to prepare the ground for other configuration parameters we may need in the future:
This will make the configuration more explicit, and it will reduce the risk of naming conflicts with other entries from the script context. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good 👍
I added changes related to this in 359f650
Note that using the standard XWiki config for intellij idea, it auto formatted the two xmls into a wrong style. I had to deactivate the feature and fix it by hand in b7d3008 .