Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: supported date32, datetime64, timestamp64, interval64 #345

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KirillKurdyukov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 43.71257% with 94 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 47.02%. Comparing base (9a7adfa) to head (79ef587).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...n/java/tech/ydb/table/values/proto/ProtoValue.java 46.59% 47 Missing ⚠️
...ain/java/tech/ydb/table/values/PrimitiveValue.java 35.18% 33 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...b/table/result/impl/ProtoPrimitiveValueReader.java 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
...ech/ydb/table/result/impl/AbstractValueReader.java 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #345      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     47.19%   47.02%   -0.18%     
- Complexity     1750     1754       +4     
============================================
  Files           311      311              
  Lines         12499    12573      +74     
  Branches       1238     1240       +2     
============================================
+ Hits           5899     5912      +13     
- Misses         6140     6199      +59     
- Partials        460      462       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@KirillKurdyukov KirillKurdyukov force-pushed the feat-supported-date32-datetime64-timestamp64-interval64 branch from 79ef587 to 7abfedc Compare January 17, 2025 13:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants