Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update github actions version #180

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DongjaJ
Copy link
Contributor

@DongjaJ DongjaJ commented Dec 19, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it?

  • update .github/workflows/*.yml's actions/checkout version 2, 3 to 4(latest)
  • update .github/workflows/*.yml's actions/setup-node version 3 to 4(latest)

Any background context you want to provide?

What are the relevant tickets?

Fixes #

Checklist

  • Added relevant tests or not required
  • Didn't break anything

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated actions in CI workflow for improved performance and compatibility.
    • Upgraded actions in GitHub Pages publishing workflow to latest versions.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates GitHub Actions workflow configurations in two files: ci.yml and ghpages-publish.yml. The primary changes involve upgrading the versions of two GitHub Actions: actions/checkout and actions/setup-node. These updates move the actions from older versions (v2.3.1/v3 and v2) to their latest versions (v4), maintaining the existing workflow structure and functionality while leveraging newer action implementations.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yml - Upgraded actions/checkout from v2.3.1 to v4
- Upgraded actions/setup-node from v2 to v4
.github/workflows/ghpages-publish.yml - Upgraded actions/checkout from v3 to v4
- Upgraded actions/setup-node from v2 to v4

Poem

🐰 Workflows hop to newer ground,
Actions updated, no changes profound!
Version bumps with graceful ease,
CI and pages dance with glee 🚀
Rabbit's code continues to soar! 🌈


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ghpages-publish.yml (1)

Line range hint 24-28: Consider updating github-pages-deploy-action to latest version

The workflow uses JamesIves/[email protected], but newer versions are available with improvements and bug fixes.

-        uses: JamesIves/[email protected]
+        uses: JamesIves/github-pages-deploy-action@v4
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b16ce07 and c156e76.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ghpages-publish.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

Line range hint 19-23: LGTM: actions/setup-node@v4 upgrade is compatible

The upgrade to setup-node@v4 is safe with your current configuration:

  • Node.js version specification is compatible
  • Cache configuration is using recommended format

16-16: Verify breaking changes in actions/checkout@v4

The upgrade from v2.3.1 to v4 is significant. While the current usage is compatible, be aware of these key changes:

  • Requires Node 16+ (compatible with your Node 18)
  • New default behavior for persist-credentials
  • Improved performance with sparse checkout
✅ Verification successful

Upgrade to actions/checkout@v4 is safe to proceed

The workflow uses a basic checkout configuration without any custom parameters. The upgrade from v2.3.1 to v4 is safe as:

  • No deprecated or removed options are used
  • The default behavior changes in v4 won't affect this simple checkout
  • Node.js 18 requirement is satisfied
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if any workflow files use features removed in v4
rg -l "persist-credentials:|filter:|fetch-depth:|lfs:|submodules:" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 87


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of the workflow file to see all checkout action configurations
cat .github/workflows/ci.yml

Length of output: 574

.github/workflows/ghpages-publish.yml (1)

10-10: LGTM: Consistent action versions across workflows

The updates to actions/checkout@v4 and actions/setup-node@v4 are consistent with the CI workflow, maintaining uniformity across the repository.

Also applies to: 13-17

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant