Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revert(planner/nodejs): Implement multi-layer build for Node.js #418

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 25, 2025

Conversation

pan93412
Copy link
Member

@pan93412 pan93412 commented Jan 25, 2025

Description (required)

There are some modules that needs the source code tree. Therefore, we will not only copy .medusa/server now.

This reverts commit 4c59e19.

Related issues & labels (optional)

  • Experiments
  • Suggested label: enhancement

There are some modules that needs the source code tree. Therefore, we will not only copy `.medusa/server` now.

This reverts commit 4c59e19.
@pan93412 pan93412 self-assigned this Jan 25, 2025
@pan93412 pan93412 requested a review from Copilot January 25, 2025 05:40

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Files not reviewed (1)
  • internal/nodejs/templates/template.Dockerfile: Language not supported
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

internal/nodejs/node_test.go:63

  • The new behavior introduced for the Medusa framework is not covered by tests. Please add a test case to cover this behavior.
func TestGetContextBasedOnMeta_WithOutputdirAndMPAFramework(t *testing.T) {
@pan93412 pan93412 requested a review from yuaanlin January 25, 2025 07:20
@yuaanlin yuaanlin merged commit c253d40 into main Jan 25, 2025
5 checks passed
@yuaanlin yuaanlin deleted the pan93412/medusa-revert-multi-layer-strategy branch January 25, 2025 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants