hpe-mpi: add 2.28 release for RH 9 #1956
Conversation
* this release should fix the issue reported in pmodels/mpich#6235 * note that the provided rpm tarball is RH 9.1 compatible and hence shouldn't be deployed before upgrade. See https://bbpteam.epfl.ch/project/issues/browse/BSD-335
|
Thank you for your pull request! Should you want to clear the PR build directory after failures, please use this pipeline. Before running the cleanup pipeline, please ensure that any PR building pipelines have been cancelled or finished running. |
|
The following build jobs of the deployment for this PR failed: Please fix the following packages that failed to build: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we mark some of these versions incompatible with the other red hats? Like
conflicts('os=rhel7', when ='@2.28.hmpt')
conflicts('os=rhel9', when ='@:2.27')
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Excellent solution 👌
Question, out of curiosity, should it be @:2.27.hmpt, or does @:2.27 covers the hmpt version as well? Also, we shouldn't forget the : missing in @2.28.hmpt: (or @2.28:) to cover future versions.
Oh, and is it allowed to add the os as a requirement to version(...) as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I think that we can drop the .hmpt, it should just be some version part. The : normally cover inclusive of all version additions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, and is it allowed to add the os as a requirement to version(...) as well?
I don't think that version can have a when clause :-/
cc: @heerener @sergiorg-hpc