gnutls-guile 3.6.14 (new formula)

[aconchillo]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install <formula>)?

---

This formula builds gnutls library again in order to build the bindings, however it only installs the bindings. By only installing the bindings we have the following issue, however the compiled library is actually not needed since the gnutls one will be used. I'm not sure how to do this well without creating this new formula, unless we enable Guile in the gnutls formula, but I feel it's better to have a gnutls-guile one.

❯ brew audit --strict gnutls-guile
Broken dependencies:
  /usr/local/Cellar/gnutls-guile/3.6.14/lib/libgnutls.30.dylib (gnutls-guile)
No broken library linkage detected
gnutls-guile:
  * Formula gnutls-guile contains deprecated SPDX licenses: ["LGPL-2.1"].
  * gnutls-guile has broken dynamic library links:

Error: 2 problems in 1 formula detected

[aconchillo]

The other issue about doing it this way is that it would probably be necessary to update gnutls-guile when updating gnutls (e.g. when updating to a newer version).

[aconchillo]

Closing in favor of #59490 since there's no way to fix the broken dynamic library link issue.