monitor: 0.10.0 -> 0.11.0 #143173
monitor: 0.10.0 -> 0.11.0 #143173
Conversation
| @@ -70,5 +77,6 @@ stdenv.mkDerivation rec { | |||
| maintainers = with maintainers; [ xiorcale ] ++ teams.pantheon.members; | |||
| platforms = platforms.linux; | |||
| license = licenses.gpl3; | |||
| mainProgram = "com.github.stsdc.monitor"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why has the executable such a weird name?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not weird, almost every package I maintains (monitor, notejot, khronos, taxi, torrential, ..., and all Pantheon packages) follows RDNN scheme for executable name. I guess I will consider creating alias only if elementary/default-settings#84 is accepted by elementary 🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@SuperSandro2000 you can find the binary easily in results and then bin
[nix-shell:~/.cache/nixpkgs-review/pr-143173]$ results/monitor/bin/com.github.stsdc.monitor
this ecosystem is not for terminal people
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this ecosystem is not for terminal people
yeah, weird.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
weird in the same way nix store paths are weird.
it solves a problem. you can install multiple applications with the same name, like Code
maybe there are more reasons. i haven't actually looked into it
https://medium.com/elementaryos/cleaning-up-app-codenames-ef9fc637ddef
This is encouraged by FreeDesktop.Org projects like D-BUS as well as by GNOME
|
Result of 1 package built:
|
|
The program shows now also disks. Nice!
|
Motivation for this change
https://github.com/stsdc/monitor/releases
https://github.com/stsdc/monitor/compare/0.10.0..0.11.0
Things done
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"./result/bin/)