Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MFMA][FRONTEND] Add more options for forced mfma layout sizes #538

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: triton-mlir
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

binarman
Copy link

This PR:

  • adds an matrix_instr_nonkdim options to force MFMA 64x4 and 4x64 layout: 464 corresponds 4(M)x64(N), 644 corresponds 64(M)x4(N)
  • adds tests for this option
  • fixes swizzling patter in some cases

MFMA size heuristic now looks like this:

  1. If kernel specific option is set, pick it
  2. If the result tile shape is larger than 32x32, pick mfma32
  3. If the tile shape is smaller than 32x32 but larger than 16x16, pick mfma16
  4. if the tile shape is smaller than 4x64 or 64x4, pick mfma4x4
  5. Otherwise, pick mfma4x64 or mfma64x4, depending on what tile fits into matrices

binarman and others added 2 commits March 19, 2024 12:49
This PR:
- adds an `matrix_instr_nonkdim` options to force MFMA 64x4 and 4x64 layout: 464 corresponds 4(M)x64(N), 644 corresponds 64(M)x4(N)
- adds tests for this option
- fixes swizzling patter in some cases

MFMA size heuristic now looks like this:

1. If kernel specific option is set, pick it
2. If the result tile shape is larger than 32x32, pick mfma32
3. If the tile shape is smaller than 32x32 but larger than 16x16, pick mfma16
4. if the tile shape is smaller than 4x64 or 64x4, pick mfma4x4
5. Otherwise, pick mfma4x64 or mfma64x4, depending on what tile fits into matrices
binarman pushed a commit to binarman/triton that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2024
…#1533)

Essentially identical to ROCm#538, but it fails formatting tests and I don't
want to ping the author on a weekend.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants