Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XS✔ ◾ Added async checking section to "Checked by" rule #7859

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

tiagov8
Copy link
Member

@tiagov8 tiagov8 commented Jan 29, 2024

cc @matt-goldman @GordonBeeming @kikibianc @Freego1783

  1. What triggered this change? (PBI link, Email Subject, conversation + reason, etc)

@adamcogan 's Re: SSW Developers group losing access

  1. What was changed?

Added section for async checking

  1. Did you do pair or mob programming (list names)?

no

@tiagov8 tiagov8 changed the title Added async checking section Added async checking section to "Checked by" rule Jan 29, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Age: 🥚 - New About 2 hours old label Jan 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

PR Metrics

Thanks for keeping your pull request small.
Thanks for adding tests.

Lines
Product Code -
Test Code -
Subtotal -
Ignored Code 8
Total 8

Metrics computed by PR Metrics. Add it to your Azure DevOps and GitHub PRs!

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Added async checking section to "Checked by" rule XS✔ ◾ Added async checking section to "Checked by" rule Jan 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tiagov8,

We found some markdown suggestions for your Pull Request:

File Error Rule
rules/checked-by-xxx/rule.md Line 57: pipe style Rule MD055
rules/checked-by-xxx/rule.md Line 57: pipe style Rule MD055
rules/checked-by-xxx/rule.md Line 57: column count Rule MD056

Please review and update your Markdown files accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Age: 🥚 - New About 2 hours old
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants