Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add new rule best Framework Rule #9478

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
---
seoDescription: Find the best framework for your admin interface. Explore top choices like React, Blazor, and Angular, based on your tech stack and project needs
type: rule
title: Do you know the best framework to build an admin interface for Web Apps?
uri: do-you-know-the-best-framework-to-build-an-admin-interface
authors:
- title: Tom Iwainski
url: https://www.ssw.com.au/people/thomas-iwainski
related:
- use-nextjs
- why-react-is-great
- why-blazor-is-great
- why-angular-is-great
created: 2024-10-224T00:00:00.001Z
guid: be0d9e5f-8580-4997-9abd-d7130ec9b240
---

When it comes to developing an admin interface for your web application, choosing the right framework is crucial. The best option often depends on your existing tech stack, the complexity of your application, and the specific needs of your admin users. We'll explore the factors to consider when selecting a framework and provide some top recommendations.

<!--endintro-->

## Stick to your existing tech stack

If your application already has an established tech stack, it's generally advisable to stick with it. Maintaining consistency across your application can simplify development, reduce onboarding time for new developers, and make it easier to manage dependencies.

Here are some reasons to stay within your current stack:

1. **Familiarity** - Your team is already comfortable with the tools and languages in use
2. **Integration** - Existing components and services can be more easily integrated
3. **Reduced overhead** - Fewer technologies mean less complexity in your build and deployment processes

However, if your current stack isn't suited for an admin interface, or if there are significant improvements to be made, it might be worth exploring new options.

## Evaluating frameworks

When considering frameworks for building an admin interface, keep the following criteria in mind:

- **Ease of Use** - The framework should allow for rapid development and easy maintenance
- **Customizability** - Look for options that provide flexibility for unique UI requirements
- **Community Support** - A strong community can be invaluable for troubleshooting and finding resources
- **Performance** - Ensure that the framework can handle your app’s data load efficiently

## Top trameworks to consider

### React / Next.js

React provides a component-based architecture that makes building complex UIs intuitive. With Next.js, you gain additional features like server-side rendering and static site generation, which can improve performance and SEO.

**Best for:** Applications that require dynamic content and a rich user interface. Ideal for teams already using React for their frontend.

For more information, see our rules:

- [Do you know why Next.js is awesome?](/use-nextjs)
- [Do you know why React is awesome?](/why-react-is-great)

### Blazor

Blazor allows you to build interactive web UIs using C# instead of JavaScript. It can be a great choice for .NET developers looking to leverage their existing skills.

**Best for:** .NET applications where you want a seamless experience across client and server-side development, particularly for teams familiar with C#.

For more information, see our rule:

- [Do you know why Blazor is awesome?](/why-blazor-is-great/)

### Angular

Angular offers a robust framework for building single-page applications (SPAs) with a strong focus on scalability and maintainability. It includes powerful features like two-way data binding, dependency injection, and a rich set of built-in components.

**Best for:** Large applications requiring a structured framework that can handle complex features and extensive data management.

For more information, see our rule:

- [Do you know why Angular is great?](/why-angular-is-great)
17 changes: 10 additions & 7 deletions rules/sprint-forecast/rule.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
---
seoDescription: Do you create a Sprint Forecast? (aka The functionality that will be developed during the Sprint) - Confirming the relationship between the Product Owner and Development Team in Agile Project Management.
type: rule
title: Do you create a Sprint Forecast? (aka The functionality that will be developed during the Sprint)
title: Do you create a Sprint Forecast? (aka The functionality that will be
developed during the Sprint)
seoDescription: Do you create a Sprint Forecast? (aka The functionality that
will be developed during the Sprint) - Confirming the relationship between the
Product Owner and Development Team in Agile Project Management.
uri: sprint-forecast
authors:
- title: Adam Cogan
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -30,13 +33,13 @@ Each Sprint in a Scrum project can be considered a mini-project that has **time*

::: email-template

| | |
| -------- | --- |
| To: | {{Product Owner}} |
| Subject: | {{Client Name}}: Sprint XXX Forecast |
| | |
| -------- | -------------------------------------- |
| To: | {{ PRODUCT OWNER }} |
| Subject: | {{ CLIENT NAME }}: Sprint XXX Forecast |
::: email-content

### Hi {{Product Owner}}
### Hi {{ PRODUCT OWNER }}

Sprint Goals (in priority order):

Expand Down
Loading