-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove filter column and add the extra explanation text #642
Remove filter column and add the extra explanation text #642
Conversation
MKodde
commented
Jun 18, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- The filter column is removed from the template as it is out of scope for now.
- An additional translatable explanation text was added
- Webtests have been reinstated
89bee6d
to
a5f9409
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe consider renaming the weird method name
@@ -49,6 +49,12 @@ public function shouldFailCreateIssue(): void | |||
$this->failIssueCreation = true; | |||
$this->storeData(); | |||
} | |||
public function shouldNotFailCreateIssue(): void |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a weird method name. No method should ever fail, but they do... not clear to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Haha it is weird indeed, this a method that modifies the behavior of a fixture. You can enable it to simulate Jira being down. I think it precisely describes its (test) purpose. And I'd like to keep it as it is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not call it enableJiraDownSimulation() then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find this more fitting in functional tests, but my pardigm is mainly gherkin oriented. I feel this fits the bill good'nuf
8c12aae
to
e66a0ff
Compare
It will not be included on the MVP of the surfconext representative page. No need to include it, leaving extra space for the SP/IdP entities.
And adjust other webtests to the new Fixtures created for the surfconext representative page
a5f9409
to
928e35b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not call it enableJiraDownSimulation() then?