Update L1Tx ref types to include multiple proto ops per tx

[bewakes]

Description

This PR does the following:

1. Adds trait BlockIndexer that takes L1 blocks and parses/extracts/processes relevant data and OpsVisitor that is to be used by a "BlockIndexer" which allows for different processing of relevant info found in transactions.
2. There are two implementations of OpsVisitor: ClientOpsVisitor and ProverOpsVisitor which differ in that ProverOpsVisitor is intended to just extract DA commitments from transactions efficiently without actually storing/processing the whole da content.
3. Remove the use of filter_protocol_op_tx_refs function whose functionality is better provided by BlockIndexer and OpsVisitors.
4. Adds unit test that tests multiple protocol ops(checkpoint and deposit in particular) can be parsed from a single transaction. Previously, only one operation could be parsed from a transaction. Also updates tests accordingly.

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature/Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality or enhances an existing one)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Refactor
• New or updated tests
• Dependency Update

Notes to Reviewers

Checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my code.
• I have commented my code where necessary.
• I have updated the documentation if needed.
• My changes do not introduce new warnings.
• I have added tests that prove my changes are effective or that my feature works.
• New and existing tests pass with my changes.

Related Issues

STR-935

[github-actions]

Commit: 1278523

SP1 Performance Test Results

program	cycles	success
BTC_BLOCKSPACE	30,370,449	✅
EL_BLOCK	97,975	✅
CL_BLOCK	91,422	✅
L1_BATCH	30,420,181	✅
L2_BATCH	5,473	✅
CHECKPOINT	28,014	✅

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.68349% with 151 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.87%. Comparing base (2830f20) to head (aecb268).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/l1tx/src/messages.rs	29.72%	52 Missing ⚠️
crates/state/src/tx.rs	0.00%	21 Missing ⚠️
crates/btcio/src/reader/tx_indexer.rs	91.62%	19 Missing ⚠️
crates/consensus-logic/src/l1_handler.rs	0.00%	13 Missing ⚠️
crates/proof-impl/btc-blockspace/src/tx_indexer.rs	92.52%	13 Missing ⚠️
crates/btcio/src/reader/query.rs	47.05%	9 Missing ⚠️
crates/l1tx/src/filter/indexer.rs	77.50%	9 Missing ⚠️
crates/l1tx/src/filter/mod.rs	96.24%	5 Missing ⚠️
...tes/sequencer/src/block_template/block_assembly.rs	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
crates/proof-impl/btc-blockspace/src/filter.rs	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
... and 3 more

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #618      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   54.68%   54.87%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         314      317       +3     
  Lines       33580    33973     +393     
==========================================
+ Hits        18363    18641     +278     
- Misses      15217    15332     +115     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
crates/btcio/src/test_utils.rs	62.10% <100.00%> (+6.00%)	⬆️
crates/btcio/src/writer/builder.rs	98.03% <ø> (ø)
crates/chaintsn/src/transition.rs	82.86% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/l1tx/src/deposit/deposit_request.rs	98.84% <ø> (ø)
crates/l1tx/src/deposit/deposit_tx.rs	96.10% <ø> (ø)
crates/l1tx/src/deposit/test_utils.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/l1tx/src/envelope/parser.rs	97.50% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/rocksdb-store/src/l1/db.rs	97.65% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/rocksdb-store/src/l2/db.rs	99.42% <100.00%> (ø)
crates/state/src/l1/tx.rs	64.70% <100.00%> (-2.95%)	⬇️
... and 15 more

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

[delbonis]

Need to rework the data structures a little bit to make them more accurately reflect the design we have now.

Also, see the visitor-oriented approach. The goal with that was to decouple the "figuring out what to do with protocol ops we get" from the "actually finding the protocol ops" parts so that handling can be different depending on if it's in the proof or in the reader.

[delbonis]

(Discussed in core sync, leaving review here to continue work.)

[bewakes]

Updated the description and made changes.

[delbonis]

Merging to unblock some new work.