Revert trunk branch versions to 1.0.0-rc3
(no hotfix)
#223
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of Changes
Remove the
-hotfix*
part of the version in our trunk branch.It was a (my) mistake to merge a
-hotfix*
version change. Hotfixes are, by definition, cherry-picked changes that are going to be released directly to users without merging.The consequence of merging this change was that the
SDK Tests
CI job started failing on SpacetimeDB PRs (e.g. see failures on clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB#2137), because it checks out this repo, which then tried to use the-hotifx3
version of SpacetimeDB. But themaster
branch of SpacetimeDB is at1.0.0-rc3
(no hotfix), because the hotfix was correctly released from a branch without merging in that repo.Although this PR reverts the version change, we do still have a tag
v1.0.0-rc3-hotfix3
that we can use to release the hotfix version (bygit push -f origin v1.0.0-rc3-hotfix3:master
) if/when desired.API
No
Requires SpacetimeDB PRs
Should work with
master
.Testsuite
If you would like to run the your SDK changes in this PR against a specific SpacetimeDB branch, specify that here. This can be a branch name or a link to a PR.
SpacetimeDB branch name: master
Testing
I claim that the CI tests passing with
master
show that this is correct. The original version change itself passed CI because it was pointing at a non-master
branch for testing. I claim it would have failed if it were tested against SpacetimeDBmaster
.Generally, this might point to a bug in how we've done this CI: We should probably only allow a PR to merge in this repo if it tests successfully against SpacetimeDB
master
, even if we want to point it at other branches to test in the meantime.