Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Core/Organization refactoring #989

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

dbalintx
Copy link
Contributor

@dbalintx dbalintx commented Jan 19, 2024

Feature or Bugfix

  • Refactoring

Detail

Adding service layer to Organizations in order to follow the resolver-service-repository structure we established for v2.0 modularization.
Also cleanup some dead code.

Relates

#741

Security

Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write N/A. Based on
OWASP 10.

  • Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes
    fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)?
    • Is the input sanitized?
    • What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume?
    • Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries?
    • Have you ensured no eval or similar functions are used?
  • Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization?
    • How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms?
    • Are you logging failed auth attempts?
  • Are you using or adding any cryptographic features?
    • Do you use a standard proven implementations?
    • Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored?
  • Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users?
    • Have you used the least-privilege principle? How?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@dbalintx
Copy link
Contributor Author

Testing:

  • unit tests

Local deployment

  • Create organization
  • Modify organization
  • Get organization
  • List organizations
  • Invite group to organization
  • List organization groups
  • Remove group from organization
  • Link environment to organization
  • List organization environments
  • Archive organization

AWS deployment

  • Create organization
  • Modify organization
  • Get organization
  • List organizations
  • Invite group to organization
  • List organization groups
  • Remove group from organization
  • Link environment to organization
  • List organization environments
  • Archive organization

return organization

@staticmethod
# TODO: resource permission check for permissions.GET_ORGANIZATION ?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add this resource permission check for GET_ORGANIZATION

Copy link
Contributor

@noah-paige noah-paige Jan 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add this resource permission check for GET_ORGANIZATION

Tested in AWS Deployment (after addressing TODO comment and adding GET_ORGANIZATION resource permission check of def get_organization(...)

  • Create organization
  • Modify organization
  • Get organization
  • List organizations
  • Invite group to organization
  • List organization groups
  • Remove group from organization
  • Link environment to organization
  • List organization environments
  • Archive organization

Think we can add this line then good to approve on my end!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for deploying it! I added the permission check

Copy link
Contributor

@noah-paige noah-paige left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me - approving

@noah-paige noah-paige merged commit a764c4a into data-dot-all:main Jan 23, 2024
8 checks passed
dlpzx added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2024
…layers (#1044)

### Feature or Bugfix
- Refactoring

### Detail
Some modules under `core` do not completely follow the standard
structure agreed for modules. In this PR I just focus on the module
`vpc`:
- Add input validation in the `api` layer in the resolvers
- Create a `service` layer for `vpc`, where we check permissions and
execute business logic
- The `db` subpackage should contain all operations on RDS. It should
not contain business logic, permissions checks or input validation.

### Relates
- #741 
- #989 same but for the `vpc` module

### Security
Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write
`N/A`. Based on
[OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/).

- Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this
includes
fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an
S3 bucket)?
  - Is the input sanitized?
- What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you
consume?
  - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries?
  - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used?
- Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires
authorization?
- How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms?
  - Are you logging failed auth attempts?
- Are you using or adding any cryptographic features?
  - Do you use a standard proven implementations?
  - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored?
- Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users?
  - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How?


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants