Update Ruby and Node #1873
Update Ruby and Node #1873
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@tagliala has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on upgrading the Ruby and Node.js versions across multiple configuration files and project settings. The changes systematically update the Ruby version from 3.3.6 to 3.4.1 and the Node.js version from 20 to 22 in CI workflows, Dockerfile, Gemfile, and package.json. These modifications ensure consistent version requirements across the project's development and deployment environments. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
tagliala
force-pushed
the
chore/ruby-node
branch
from
9fb66ed to
9679ca6
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🛑 Comments failed to post (3)
docker/icare/Dockerfile (1)
4-4:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate Node version in Dockerfile to match other configurations
While the Ruby version has been updated to 3.4.1, the Node version (20.10.0) in the Dockerfile doesn't match the version 22 specified in other configuration files.
Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
-ARG NODE_VERSION=20.10.0 +ARG NODE_VERSION=22.0.0Also applies to: 27-27
package.json (1)
6-6: 💡 Codebase verification
Consider using Node 20 LTS instead of Node 22
Node 22 is currently in development and not yet released for production use. While your dependencies don't explicitly prohibit Node 22, using the current LTS version (Node 20) would be more reliable for production environments.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify package compatibility with Node 22
Node 22 is a very recent release. Let's verify compatibility with key dependencies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check package compatibility with Node 22 for pkg in @babel/core shakapacker webpack; do echo "Checking $pkg..." curl -s "https://registry.npmjs.org/$pkg" | jq -r '.versions | keys[]' | sort -V | tail -n 1 curl -s "https://registry.npmjs.org/$pkg" | jq -r '.versions | to_entries[] | select(.value.engines?.node != null) | .value.engines.node' | tail -n 1 doneLength of output: 1112
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)
33-33:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate Ruby version in slim-lint job to match other configurations
The Ruby version has been updated to 3.4.1 in the rubocop job, but the slim-lint job still uses 3.3.6. This inconsistency should be fixed.
Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
- ruby-version: '3.3.6' + ruby-version: '3.4.1'Also applies to: 52-52
tagliala
force-pushed
the
chore/ruby-node
branch
from
9679ca6 to
dcec1c2
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit