Rewrite type system and compiler (v4)

[Schamper]

• Rewrite entire type system to be class based
  • All types are now classes, and parsed values are instances of that class
• Rewrite compiler to be compatible with this type system

TODO:

• Add unit test for custom type
• Add example for custom type
• Determine repr() for structure class (not instance)
• Work out pickling?
  • Maybe related, but work out "module path" for new type classes
• Update README

(DIS-75, DIS-77, DIS-103, DIS-104, DIS-965, DIS-1087, DIS-1124, DIS-1970)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 53 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (92875c1) 89.04% compared to head (0ef089a) 91.40%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
dissect/cstruct/types/enum.py	87.25%	13 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/parser.py	83.58%	11 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/types/structure.py	97.14%	9 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/compiler.py	97.88%	5 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/types/flag.py	78.26%	5 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/types/base.py	96.07%	4 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/cstruct.py	94.11%	3 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/types/char.py	96.22%	2 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/bitbuffer.py	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #35      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.04%   91.40%   +2.36%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        1862     2106     +244     
==========================================
+ Hits         1658     1925     +267     
+ Misses        204      181      -23     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	91.40% <95.61%> (+2.36%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[cecinestpasunepipe]

LGTM

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.86441% with 37 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.00%. Comparing base (ca4b29a) to head (d655171).

Files	Patch %	Lines
dissect/cstruct/parser.py	83.58%	11 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/types/structure.py	97.14%	9 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/compiler.py	97.88%	5 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/types/base.py	96.07%	4 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/cstruct.py	94.23%	3 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/types/char.py	96.22%	2 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/bitbuffer.py	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/types/enum.py	98.97%	1 Missing ⚠️
dissect/cstruct/types/flag.py	96.29%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #35      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.32%   92.00%   +2.68%     
==========================================
  Files          21       20       -1     
  Lines        1929     2115     +186     
==========================================
+ Hits         1723     1946     +223     
+ Misses        206      169      -37     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	92.00% <96.86%> (+2.68%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pyrco]

that shouldn't have been a self-requested review ;)