fix: fix zaar evm chain id #248
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
testnets/zaar/chain.json(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages: registry-initiation-1
🔇 Additional comments (2)
testnets/zaar/chain.json (2)
5-5: Question: Is this unusually large chain ID value intentional?The new chain ID (3814270102388757) is significantly larger than typical EVM chain IDs. Most networks use much smaller values (e.g., Ethereum mainnet uses 1).
Please verify:
- Is this large value intentional?
- Are there any technical limitations or implications of using such a large chain ID?
- Is this value supported by all client implementations and tools?
5-5: Verify the uniqueness and validity of the new EVM chain ID.The new chain ID (3814270102388757) should be checked against existing EVM networks to ensure uniqueness and prevent potential replay attacks.
Let's verify this chain ID against known EVM chain ID registries:
✅ Verification successful
The new EVM chain ID is valid and follows project conventions.
The chain ID:
- Is unique across both the project's chains and public EVM networks
- Follows the project's pattern of using large chain IDs (all other EVM chains in the project use similar large numbers)
- Complies with the chain schema requirements
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the new chain ID exists in common EVM chain ID registries # Check chainlist.org API (if available) curl -s "https://chainid.network/chains.json" | jq '.[] | select(.chainId == 3814270102388757)' # Search for any mentions of this chain ID in the codebase rg -i "3814270102388757"Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all chain.json files and extract their evm_chain_id values fd chain.json --type f --exec sh -c 'echo "=== $1 ==="; cat "$1" | jq -r ".evm_chain_id"' sh {} # Also check the schema to understand if there are any constraints on evm_chain_id cat chain.schema.jsonLength of output: 23848
fix zaar evm chain id
Summary by CodeRabbit