[#600] Update faq.yml

_data/faq.yml

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ it:
     answer: |
       I soggetti destinatari delle disposizioni degli artt. 68 e 69 del CAD
       sono le pubbliche amministrazioni di cui all’art. 1, comma 2, del decreto
-      legislativo 30 marzo 2001, n. 165, nel rispetto del riparto di competenza
+      legislativo 30 marzo 2001, n. 165, nel rispetto del reparto di competenza
       di cui all’art. 117 della Costituzione; tra queste, si annoverano gli
       istituti e scuole di ogni ordine e grado e le istituzioni educative.
       Il combinato disposto degli artt. 68 e 69 del CAD non opera alcuna
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ it:
       Chiunque può segnalare presunte violazioni delle disposizioni del CAD,
       tra cui quelle ex artt. 68 e 69, accedendo all’apposita <a
       href="https://difensorecivicodigitale.gov.it/index.php?a=add">area
-      dedicata</a> presente sul sito dell’AgID
+      dedicata</a> presente sul sito dell’AgID.
   item8:
     question: Quali sanzioni potrebbero essere comminate ad una PA qualora
       acquisisca soluzioni, programmi informatici senza effettuare la valutazione
@@ -115,10 +115,127 @@ it:
       href="https://docs.italia.it/italia/developers-italia/lg-acquisizione-e-riuso-software-per-pa-docs/it/stabile/acquisizione-software/macro-fase-2-analisi-delle-soluzioni-a-riuso-delle-pa-e-delle-soluzioni-open-source.html#fase-2-2-valutazione-soluzioni-riusabili-per-la-pa">
       linee guida su acquisizione e riuso di software per le pubbliche
       amministrazioni</a> indica il grado di attività svolta nell'ultimo arco
-      temporale su ogni repository indicizzato in catalogo. Una spiegazione approfondita dei parametri
-      utilizzati per effettuare il calcolo è presente in <a
+      temporale su ogni repository indicizzato in catalogo. Una spiegazione
+      approfondita dei parametri utilizzati per effettuare il calcolo è presente in <a
       href="https://github.com/italia/developers-italia-backend/blob/master/docs/vitalityIndexItaliano.md">
       questa pagina</a>. Questo indice è calcolato ogni notte e, attualmente, la
       finestra temporale considerata è di 60 giorni.
 
 en:
+  item1:
+    question: Do articles 68 and 69 of the CAD apply to public schools for
+      the acquisition and reuse of software, be it software
+      for teaching or software for administrative purposes?
+    answer: |
+      Recipients of the provisions of Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD
+      are the public administrations referred to in art. 1, paragraph 2, of the
+      legislative decree March 30, 2001, n. 165, in respect of the division of
+      competence of art. 117 of the Constitution; among these, there are the
+      institutes and schools of all levels and educational institutions.
+      The combined provisions of Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD do not operate any
+      distinction about the type of purpose of a software. The object of the
+      obligation established by the above mentioned provisions is the software of
+      ownership of public administration.
+  item2:
+    question: In which cases is the PA considered owner of a software?
+    answer: |
+      The administration must be considered owner of a software realized on
+      its own specific indications every time:  
+      <ul>
+      <li>it commissioned the solution, through a procurement contract
+      or other negotiating circumstances, and the contract foresees the acquisition
+      of all intellectual and industrial property rights
+      on the software developed on its client's behalf or in any case it does not
+      attribute such ownership by the contractor or third parties;</li>.
+      <li>the software has been realized by internal resources of the administration.</li>
+      </ul>
+  item3:
+    question: Do articles 68 and 69 of CAD apply before any software procurement?
+    answer: |
+      Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD apply in any case of solutions acquisition by
+      a Public Administration, software or parts of it
+      regardless of the type of procedure.
+      For more information about CAD see <a
+      href="https://docs.italia.it/italia/piano-triennale-ict/codice-amministrazione-digitale-docs/it/v2018-09-28/_rst/capo6_art68.html">this
+      link</a>.
+  item4:
+    question: Can non-open source software owned by a PA be put to Reuse?
+    answer: |
+      It is necessary to distinguish between software requested and specifically
+      developed for a Public Administration (or developed within it)
+      and software of commercial nature of which an administration has instead
+      acquired a right of use license. Only the software belonging to the first
+      category is subject to art. 69 of the CAD on reuse: for such solutions
+      administrations must obligatorily acquire full ownership of the source code
+      and must proceed with its release in open source. Instead the commercial
+      software acquired by means of a use right license can not be put to reuse.
+  item5:
+    question: Which are the indications provided for the purposes of compliance
+      of art. 69 regarding the choice of the license?
+    answer: |
+      The "Guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public
+      administrations", adopted by AgID in implementation of Articles 68 and 69
+      of the CAD, foresee that the choice of the license by a PA is
+      made by choosing a license among those certified by the Open Source
+      Initiatives. For more information about licensing see <a
+      href="https://docs.italia.it/italia/developers-italia/gl-acquisition-and-reuse-software-for-pa-docs/en/stabile/software-reuse/open-licences-and-selecting-a-licence.html#choosing-a-licence">this
+      resource</a>.
+  item6:
+    question: Is it possible in the process of Reuse of a solution
+      apply, by virtue of the principle of compatibility of licenses, to the work
+      derived a different license from the original work?
+    answer: |
+      The "Guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public
+      administrations", adopted by AgID in implementation of Articles 68 and 69
+      CAD, define, in paragraph 3.5.3, the decision tree for the
+      choice of an open license; in particular, if the release of the software
+      refers to a modification of existing open source software (so
+      taken for reuse by other administrations or owned by third parties)
+      the administration must use the same license with which the software has
+      been originally distributed, in order to facilitate its maximum
+      interoperability and reuse with other users of the same software.
+  item7:
+    Question: To which authorities can be reported the
+      non-application by a PA of articles 68 and 69 of CAD?
+    answer: |
+      According to art. 17, paragraph 1-quater is established by the AgID the
+      Office of the Digital Ombudsman who has the task of collecting all reports
+      of supposed violations of the Code of the Digital Administration, or any
+      other rule on the subject of digitization and innovation, to guarantee
+      the digital rights of the citizens and businesses.
+      Anyone can report supposed violations of CAD provisions,
+      among which those ex art. 68 and 69, accessing the appropriate <a
+      href="https://difensorecivicodigitale.gov.it/index.php?a=add">area
+      dedicated</a> on AgID website.
+  item8:
+    question: What fines could be imposed at a PA that acquires solutions,
+      without making a technical and economic comparison?
+    answer: |
+      The CAD does not provide direct fines; however, if a PA disregards the
+      provisions concerning the acquisition of software may arise management
+      and disciplinary responsibility profiles without prejudice to any
+      liability for damages treasury.
+  item9:
+    question: What fines could be imposed to a PA if it not proceed to the release
+      in open source of the software developed or commissioned by it?
+    answer: |
+      The CAD does not provide for direct fines; however, without prejudice to
+      possible profiles of managerial and disciplinary responsibility,
+      the neglected reuse release of software solutions prevents others
+      administrations to proceed to the relative evaluation and acquisition in
+      reuse, thus configuring a possible liability for tax damage.
+  item10:
+    question: How is the displayed vitality index for each
+      software calculated?
+    answer: |
+      The vitality index (vitality index), as expected by the
+      <a
+      href="https://docs.italia.it/italia/developers-italia/gl-acquisition-and-reuse-software-for-pa-docs/en/stabile/software-acquisition/macro-phase-2-Analysis-of-reusable-PA-solutions-and-open-source-solutions.html#phase-2-2-assessment-of-reusable-solutions-for-the-pa">
+      guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public sector
+      administrations</a> indicates the degree of activity carried out in the
+      last time span on each indexed repository in the catalog. An in-depth
+      explanation of the parameters used to make the calculation is present in <a
+      href="https://github.com/italia/developers-italia-backend/blob/master/docs/vitalityIndex.md">
+      this page</a>. This index is calculated every night and, currently, the
+      time window considered is 60 days.
+